Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders and senior Supreme Court lawyers have expressed concerns over Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the residence of CJI Chandrachud for Ganpati Puja, questioning its potential effect on judicial transparency.
PM Modi, wearing a traditional Maharashtrian cap, joined the CJI and his wife at their New Delhi residence on Wednesday, where they were seen performing the aarti and offering prayers to Lord Ganesha.
Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut raised objections to the visit, arguing that such interactions between constitutional authorities and political leaders could erode public trust in the judiciary, particularly in light of an ongoing case involving the Maharashtra government that the CJI is hearing. Raut suggested that the CJI should recuse himself from the case to avoid any perception of bias.
“The Prime Minister visited the Chief Justice’s residence and they performed aarti together. Our concern is that when the custodians of the Constitution meet with political leaders in this manner, it raises doubts. Our case in Maharashtra, which involves the current government, is being heard before the Chief Justice and the Prime Minister is part of it. We are concerned about whether we will get justice. The Chief Justice should consider recusing himself from this case,” said Sanjay Raut.
He added that during Ganpati Utsav, it is customary for people to visit each other’s homes, though he was unsure of how many homes the prime minister had visited so far. He also noted that there were many celebrations in Delhi, including at Maharashtra Sadan.
Rajya Sabha MP Priyanka Chaturvedi shared on X, expressing hope that once the festivities concluded, the Chief Justice would prioritize completing the hearing on Maharashtra’s political situation.
Also read | “Saw Our Friend Hanging For Hours”: Massive Protest At IIT-Guwahati
“Okay. After the festivities are over hopefully CJI will deem fit and be slightly freer to conclude the hearing on Maharashtra and the blatant disregard of Article 10 of the Constitution in Maharashtra. Oh wait, elections round the corner anyway, it can be adjourned for another day,” wrote Priyanka Chaturvedi.
Meanwhile, Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan said CJI Chandrachud allowing Modi to visit him at his residence for a private meeting sends a troubling message about the judiciary’s independence and its role in safeguarding citizens’ rights and ensuring government accountability.
“Shocking that CJI Chandrachud allowed Modi to visit him at his residence for a private meeting. This sends a very bad signal to the judiciary which is tasked with the responsibility of protecting the fundamental right of citizens from the executive & ensuring that the govt acts within bounds of Constitution. That is why there has to be an arms-length separation between the executive & judiciary,” Bhushan wrote on X.
Lawyer and activist Indira Jai Singh said the Chief Justice of India has undermined the separation of powers between the executive and judiciary. “Chief Justice of India has compromised the separation of powers between the Executive and Judiciary. Lost all confidence in the independence of the CJI . The SCBA must condemn this publicly displayed compromise of Independence of the CJI from the Executive,” she wrote on X.
For more updates, click here.
